The McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP)

  • Chan T
  • Sherbino J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PROBLEM: To assess resident competence, generalist programs such as emergency medicine (EM), which cover a broad content and skills base, require a substantial number of work-based assessments (WBAs) that integrate qualitative and quantitative data. APPROACH: The McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP), implemented in McMaster University's Royal College EM residency program in 2011-2012, is a programmatic assessment system that collects and aggregates data from 42 WBA instruments aligned with EM tasks and mapped to the CanMEDS competency framework. These instruments incorporate task-specific checklists, behaviorally anchored task-specific and global performance ratings, and written comments. They are completed by faculty following direct observation of residents during shifts. The rotation preceptor uses aggregated data to complete an end-of-rotation report for each resident in the form of a qualitative global assessment of performance. OUTCOMES: The quality of end-of-rotation reports-as measured by comparing report quality one year prior to and one year after McMAP implementation using the Completed Clinical Evaluation Report Rating tool-has improved significantly (P < .001). This may be a result of basing McMAP's end-of-rotation reports on robust documentation of performance by multiple raters throughout a rotation rather than relying on a single faculty member's recall at rotation's end as in the previous system. NEXT STEPS: By aligning theory-based assessment instruments with authentic EM work-based tasks, McMAP has changed the residency program's culture to normalize daily feedback. Next steps include determining how to handle "big data" in assessment and delineating policies for promotion decisions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chan, T., & Sherbino, J. (2015). The McMaster Modular Assessment Program (McMAP). Academic Medicine, 90(7), 900–905. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000707

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free