Confounding Factors in the Observational Productivity-Diversity Relationship in Forests

  • Vilà M
  • Inchausti P
  • Vayreda J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the rapidly expanding field of adventure-based therapy, group development has long been recognized as a cornerstone for success. One of the critical factors considered important by most theorists for successful group development is sequencing, or the order in which activities are presented to participants. By sequentially ordering events so that they are successively more challenging, adventure-based intervention theorists agree that group development is facilitated. However, this theory, like many in this field, has not been experimentally tested. The current study seeks to investigate the relationship between group development on a challenge course and sequencing of activities. In a typical challenge course, activities can be divided into four stages: orientation, team activities, advanced team activities, and termination. Each is designed to encourage the development of different factors associated with successful group development. If sequencing is as crucial as hypothesized, then altering the sequence of activities should have a measurable impact on the development of groups as they progress through a challenge course. To explore this hypothesis, three experimental groups proceeded through a challenge course. Each experimental condition progressed through a normally ordered challenge course sequence, but had a different stage omitted. Only the control condition groups participated in all four stages. Using the Expressiveness, Anger/Aggression, and Order/Organization subscales from the Group Environment Questionnaire (Moos, 1994) and the Engagement and Avoidance dimensions from the Group Climate Questionnaire Short Form (MacKenzie, 1983), 12 planned comparisons were made between the different experimental conditions to see where differences lay. Preliminary analyses indicate there were no differences based on ethnicity, age or gender on the variables of interest. Primary results indicate that the only significant differences occurred on the experimental condi (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vilà, M., Inchausti, P., Vayreda, J., Barrantes, O., Gracia, C., Ibáñez, J. J., & Mata, T. (2005). Confounding Factors in the Observational Productivity-Diversity Relationship in Forests. In Forest Diversity and Function (pp. 65–86). Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26599-6_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free