Prevention Knowledge and Its Practice Towards COVID-19 Among General Population of Saudi Arabia: A Gender-based Perspective

  • Alshammary F
  • Siddiqui A
  • Amin J
  • et al.
20Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study is an original contribution to the gender-based perspective of measuring knowledge and practice towards COVID-19 among Saudi population. OBJECTIVE This study investigates the existing knowledge of COVID-19 among both genders and its likely use in practice to combat COVID-19. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross sectional study with an online survey and data collected from all the five regions of Saudi Arabia. PARTICIPANTS AND METHOD A structured, self-reported validated questionnaire was developed based on the World Health Organization (WHO) general public advice towards COVID-19 prevention. This study has employed snow-ball sampling technique. SAMPLE SIZE 627 participants (Male n=343, 54.7%) and (Females n=284, 45.3%). RESULTS This study has found that women not only carry better knowledge, but their practicing behavior is far better than the male respondents. Females practiced their knowledge of hands hygiene more in comparison to males (86% vs 80 %, p >0.05). Female respondents were also practicing more about sneezing/coughing into their elbows as compared to males(79 % vs 71%, p < 0.05). Likewise, the practice of knowledge of staying at home to prevent infection (females 98.2 % vs males 95.5%, p > 0.05), and (females 83.2 % vs males 81.5%, p > 0.05) respectively. CONCLUSION This study shows that women were more compliant to the WHO public health covid-19 prevention advice than men which can decrease the chances of covid-19 infection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alshammary, F., Siddiqui, A. A., Amin, J., Ilyas, M., Rathore, H. A., Hassan, I., … Kamal, M. A. (2020). Prevention Knowledge and Its Practice Towards COVID-19 Among General Population of Saudi Arabia: A Gender-based Perspective. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 27(13), 1642–1648. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612826666200818213558

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free