Representing the effects of building height variability on urban canopy flow

11Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We conducted large-eddy simulations over 98 urban arrays with varying building densities and height distributions. Compared with uniform-height urban arrays, the influence of height variability on urban flow is pronounced and acts differently in two idealized urban configurations: the low buildings induce higher wind speed and stronger turbulence over staggered arrays but act inversely over aligned building configurations. The flow motions around tall buildings generate strong dispersive fluxes, which are sometimes of similar magnitude to the turbulent momentum flux and responsible for a persistent isolated roughness flow pattern in the upper canopy regardless of the urban density. Tall buildings further contribute disproportionately to the form drag of the urban surface, reaching up to 3.9 times the form drag induced by buildings of height equal to the average building height, in dense layouts. The flow inflection points—that is, the largest wind-speed gradient that defines the aerodynamic interface between the urban canopy flow and the surface layer flow above—are found to be displaced to the maximum building height if less than 25% of buildings are below the mean building height. These findings provide critical insight for the development of urban canopy models, where the impacts of height variability on flow are often linked to the vertical variation in urban density alone. To address this deficiency, we provide a case study that considers the drag amplification due to the impact of vertical urban structures in the urban canopy model, enabling high-resolution regional climate models to reproduce urban air flows better.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lu, J., Nazarian, N., Hart, M. A., Krayenhoff, E. S., & Martilli, A. (2024). Representing the effects of building height variability on urban canopy flow. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 150(758), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4584

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free