Triple Semicircular Canal Plugging versus Labyrinthectomy for Meniere Disease: A Retrospective Study

10Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The study goals were to compare the long-term efficacy of semicircular canal plugging (SCP) with labyrinthectomy in the treatment of advanced Meniere's disease (MD). Study Design: A retrospective study. Setting: Single tertiary medical center. Methods: A total of 116 MD patients (TSCP group of 90; labyrinthectomy group of 26) with complete medical documents in Shandong Provincial ENT Hospital, from March 2017 to March 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including a battery of auditory and vestibular function tests, recovery time from imbalance and function level scores (FLS). Results: The total control rate of vertigo in the TSCP group was 96.7% (87/90). The rate of hearing loss was 23.3% (21/90). The control rate of vertigo in the labyrinthectomy group was 100% (26/26). All patients lost their auditory function after labyrinthectomy with a 100% hearing loss rate. There was no significant difference in the vertigo control rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The hearing loss rate in the TSCP group was significantly lower than that in the labyrinthectomy group (P < 0.00). The median time recovered from imbalance was 15 days in TSCP group and 21 days in labyrinthectomy group, which is significantly different (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the FLS between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to labyrinthectomy, TSCP can preserve hearing at a high probability; meanwhile, otolith organ function preservation benefits patients from faster vestibular compensation. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:3178–3184, 2023.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, X., Lyu, Y., Li, Y., Jian, H., Wang, J., Song, Y., … Zhang, D. (2023). Triple Semicircular Canal Plugging versus Labyrinthectomy for Meniere Disease: A Retrospective Study. Laryngoscope, 133(11), 3178–3184. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.30690

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free