Food Intake Compared to Exercise Association with Obesity in Children Ages 3–6

3Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Childhood obesity affects 19.3% of children ages 2 to 19 years in the US, and 25.6% of Hispanic children. Study objectives were to (1) assess the feasibility of monitoring physical activity and daily caloric intake in children ages 3 to 6 years, (2) assess whether known obesity risk factors apply to this age-group, and (3) explore the factors that may contribute to the higher prevalence of obesity in Hispanic preschooler. Methods: Children ages 3 to 6 years were recruited at well child visits (n = 37, 65% male, 30% Hispanic). Parents completed a questionnaire (child’s physical activity and screen time) along with a detailed dietary assessment. Children were provided with a fitness tracker worn for 5 days. Fisher’s exact test, t test/Wilcoxon rank sum tests were conducted. Results: Thirty-four (92%) participants produced usable activity data. Baseline dietary recall was completed by 35 (97%) of the parents and 25 (68%) completed the second unassisted dietary recall. Mean body mass index of the study sample was 60th percentile, 12 (32%) classified as overweight/obese. Children with overweight/obesity showed no significant difference in mean daily calories compared with those without (1403.9 vs 1406.1 Kcal/day, P = .980) or daily hours of screen time (1.5 6 1.1 vs 1.7 6 0.8, P = .442). Children with overweight/obesity had fewer mean daily steps compared with those without overweight/obesity (8038 6 2685 vs 10038 6 2599 P = .051). Discussion: Findings indicate that pedometer activity tracking can be used in children 3 to 6 years old and that decreased physical activity correlates more closely to preschool overweight/obesity than caloric intake.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bedell, D., Sevcik, T., Daly, J. M., & Levy, B. T. (2022). Food Intake Compared to Exercise Association with Obesity in Children Ages 3–6. Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 35(6), 1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2022.220159R1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free