Comment on 'magnitude conversion problem using general orthogonal regression' by H. R. Wason, Ranjit Das and M. L. Sharma, (Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1091-1096)

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The argument proposed by Wason et al. that the conversion of magnitudes from a scale (e.g. Msor mb) to another (e.g. Mw), using the coefficients computed by the general orthogonal regression method (Fuller) is biased if the observed values of the predictor (independent) variable are used in the equation as well as the methodology they suggest to estimate the supposedly true values of the predictor variable are wrong for a number of theoretical and empirical reasons. Hence, we advise against the use of such methodology for magnitude conversions. © The Authors 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.

References Powered by Scopus

Regression problems for magnitudes

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Global regression relations for conversion of surface wave and body wave magnitudes to moment magnitude

127Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnitude conversion problem using general orthogonal regression

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Empirical conversion between teleseismic magnitudes (m<inf>b</inf> and M<inf>s</inf>) and moment magnitude (M<inf>w</inf>) at the Global, Euro-Mediterranean and Italian scale

56Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A declustered earthquake catalog for the iranian plateau

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Regression between earthquake magnitudes having errors with known variances

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gasperini, P., & Lolli, B. (2014, November 1). Comment on “magnitude conversion problem using general orthogonal regression” by H. R. Wason, Ranjit Das and M. L. Sharma, (Geophys. J. Int., 190, 1091-1096). Geophysical Journal International. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggs077

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘18‘20‘22‘2300.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

60%

Engineering 2

40%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0