Does Practical Wisdom Solve the Moral Knowledge-Action Gap?

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Abstract – This paper examines the Aristotelian foundations of the neo-Aristotelian Phronesis Model (APM) (Darnell et al. Human Development. 2019;62(3):101-29; Kristjánsson & Fowers. Phronesis: Retrieving Practical Wisdom in Psychology, Philosophy, and Education. 2024) in light of its claim to resolve the moral knowledge-action gap. The paper argues that the APM departs from Aristotle’s moral psychology by construing phronesis as having an action component. On Aristotle’s account, practical wisdom culminates in prohairesis (reasoned choice or decision), not necessarily in action itself. Rather than rejecting the APM, the paper shows that Aristotle’s own conception of phronesis offers other resources, some of which are acknowledged by proponents of the APM but not integrated into the model. Revisiting Aristotle’s writings brings into view the interpretive, collective, and political dimensions of practical wisdom. These factors help understand better how wise moral decisions may, or may not, be enacted in concrete social contexts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanderse, W. (2026). Does Practical Wisdom Solve the Moral Knowledge-Action Gap? Human Development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000551960

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free