This paper aims at comparing the use of different software environments for the study of a simple unreinforced masonry building through nonlinear static analyses. The presented results are part of a wider research project conducted within the ReLUIS consortium, and specifically within a research task whose purpose is providing practitioners with results and tools for an aware employment of commercial software packages for modelling masonry structures. In this study one of the benchmark structures of the research program is analysed; a two-story building characterized by rigid horizontal diaphragms, considering different configurations in terms of openings arrangements and effectiveness of ring beams, is subjected to seismic load conditions. Software packages considering two- and three- dimensional structural models are employed, and the obtained results are compared in terms of capacity curves and collapse mechanisms. One of the critical aspects on the basic assumptions made by software in terms of way to apply the horizontal loads is further investigated. In addition, the role of the shear strength is analysed correlating the mechanical properties to be adopted with micro- and macro- models. The considered models present very different features, and the analogies and differences obtained in the results are critically interpreted in view of the different hypotheses made by the software tools in terms of modelling strategies and adopted constitutive laws.
CITATION STYLE
Cannizzaro, F., Castellazzi, G., Grillanda, N., Pantò, B., & Petracca, M. (2022). Modelling the nonlinear static response of a 2-storey URM benchmark case study: comparison among different modelling strategies using two- and three-dimensional elements. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20(4), 2085–2114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01183-0
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.