Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries

28Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Asthma is one of the most common noncommunicable diseases; in the majority of patients it is well controlled with inhaled bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids, but the management of severe asthma has been a significant challenge historically. The introduction of novel biologic drugs in the past few decades has revolutionised the field, presenting physicians with a variety of biologic drugs with different mechanisms for the treatment of severe asthma. It is of crucial importance to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs by following their “real-life” effectiveness rather than relying solely on their efficacy, established in carefully designed clinical trials, which therefore do not necessarily match the profile of the real-life patient. Understanding the actual effectiveness of the specific drugs in real-life patients is a crucial part of tailoring the right drugs to the right patients. Registries serve as an important tool in obtaining real-life evidence, since they are in effect observational studies, following the entire patient population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paoletti, G., Pepys, J., Casini, M., Di Bona, D., Heffler, E., Goh, C. Y. Y., … Canonica, G. W. (2022). Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries. European Respiratory Review, 31(164). https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0278-2021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free