Outcomes with catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with anticoagulation alone in patients with acute deep venous thrombosis

13Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: The authors aimed to investigate the benefits and risks of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Background: The role of CDT in the management of DVT is evolving. Data on CDT versus anticoagulation alone in acute DVT is sparse. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that compared CDT to anticoagulation alone in patients with acute DVT. Results: We included 11 studies (four randomized control trials [RCTs] and seven observational studies) with a total of 8,737 patients. During hospital stay, patients who received CDT had higher odds of major bleeding (2.5% vs. 1.6%; OR 1.46, 95% CI [1.07, 1.98], p =.02), blood transfusion (10.8% vs. 6.2%; OR 1.8, 95% CI [1.52, 2.13], p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abraham, B., Sedhom, R., Megaly, M., Saad, M., Elbadawi, A., Elgendy, I. Y., … Attallah, A. (2021). Outcomes with catheter-directed thrombolysis compared with anticoagulation alone in patients with acute deep venous thrombosis. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 97(1), E61–E70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29226

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free