An objective comparison of pulsed, lock-in, and frequency modulated thermal wave imaging

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

An objective comparison of three different thermal non-destructive evaluation (NDE) techniques - pulsed thermography (PT), lock-in (LI) thermography, and frequency modulated thermal wave imaging (FMTWI), has been carried out on a CFRP sample. The matched energy comparison shows that on the basis of computed SNR, the shallow defects are better detected by PT, while deeper defects are detected equally by all techniques. © 2012 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chatterjee, K., Tuli, S., Pickering, S. G., & Almond, D. P. (2012). An objective comparison of pulsed, lock-in, and frequency modulated thermal wave imaging. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1430, pp. 1812–1815). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4716431

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free