Association between gene expression signatures and clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer: Exploratory analysis from the randomized, controlled, phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial

20Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background In the randomized, controlled, phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial, second-line pembrolizumab did not significantly prolong overall survival (OS) versus paclitaxel in patients with PD-L1-positive (combined positive score ≥1) advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer but did elicit a longer duration of response and offered a favorable safety profile. This prespecified exploratory analysis was conducted to evaluate associations between tumor gene expression signatures and clinical outcomes in the phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial. Methods Using RNA sequencing data obtained from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded baseline tumor tissue samples, we evaluated the 18-gene T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (Tcell inf GEP) and 10 non-Tcell inf GEP signatures (angiogenesis, glycolysis, granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cell (gMDSC), hypoxia, monocytic MDSC (mMDSC), MYC, proliferation, RAS, stroma/epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition/transforming growth factor-β, WNT). The association between each signature on a continuous scale and outcomes was analyzed using logistic (objective response rate (ORR)) and Cox proportional hazards regression (progression-free survival (PFS) and OS). One-sided (pembrolizumab) and two-sided (paclitaxel) p values were calculated for Tcell inf GEP (prespecified α=0.05) and the 10 non-Tcell inf GEP signatures (multiplicity-adjusted; prespecified α=0.10). Results RNA sequencing data were available for 137 patients in each treatment group. Tcell inf GEP was positively associated with ORR (p=0.041) and PFS (p=0.026) for pembrolizumab but not paclitaxel (p>0.05). The Tcell inf GEP-adjusted mMDSC signature was negatively associated with ORR (p=0.077), PFS (p=0.057), and OS (p=0.033) for pembrolizumab, while the Tcell inf GEP-adjusted glycolysis (p=0.018), MYC (p=0.057), and proliferation (p=0.002) signatures were negatively associated with OS for paclitaxel. Conclusions This exploratory analysis of tumor Tcell inf GEP showed associations with ORR and PFS for pembrolizumab but not for paclitaxel. Tcell inf GEP-adjusted mMDSC signature was negatively associated with ORR, PFS, and OS for pembrolizumab but not paclitaxel. These data suggest myeloid-driven suppression may play a role in resistance to PD-1 inhibition in G/GEJ cancer and support a strategy of considering immunotherapy combinations which target this myeloid axis. Trial registration number NCT02370498.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shitara, K., Di Bartolomeo, M., Mandala, M., Ryu, M. H., Caglevic, C., Olesinski, T., … Özgürolu, M. (2023). Association between gene expression signatures and clinical outcomes of pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer: Exploratory analysis from the randomized, controlled, phase III KEYNOTE-061 trial. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2023-006920

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free