A simulation study of the effects of assignment of prior identity-by- descent probabilities to unselected sib pairs, in covariance-structure modeling of a quantitative-trait locus

21Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Sib pair-selection strategies, designed to identify the most informative sib pairs in order to detect a quantitative-trait locus (QTL), give rise to a missing-data problem in genetic covariance-structure modeling of QTL effects. After selection, phenotypic data are available for all sibs, but marker data - and, consequently, the identity-by-descent (IBD) probabilities - are available only in selected sib pairs. One possible solution to this missing- data problem is to assign prior IBD probabilities (i.e., expected values) to the unselected sib pairs. The effect of this assignment in genetic covariance-structure modeling is investigated in the present paper. Two maximum-likelihood approaches to estimation are considered, the pi-hat approach and the IBD-mixture approach. In the simulations, sample size, selection criteria, QTL-increaser allele frequency, and gene action are manipulated. The results indicate that the assignment of prior IBD probabilities results in serious estimation bias in the pi-hat approach. Bias is also present in the IBD-mixture approach, although here the bias is generally much smaller. The null distribution of the log-likelihood ratio (i.e., in absence of any QTL effect) does not follow the expected null distribution in the pi-hat approach after selection. In the IBD-mixture approach, the null distribution does agree with expectation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dolan, C. V., Boomsma, D. I., & Neale, M. C. (1999). A simulation study of the effects of assignment of prior identity-by- descent probabilities to unselected sib pairs, in covariance-structure modeling of a quantitative-trait locus. American Journal of Human Genetics, 64(1), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1086/302189

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free