Orthognathic versus Camouflage Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

9Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) aimed to compare the treatment effects of orthognathic surgery and orthodontic camouflage treatment in adult subjects with Class III malocclusion (C-III-M). Two independent reviewers conducted the literature search comprehensively from 1990 to 8 November 2021. PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, EBSCOhost and Google Scholar databases were included for literature search. Moreover, a manual search of references from relevant studies was performed. Based on the literature search, a total of six articles were selected for SR and three articles fulfilled the criteria of a MA. Standardized mean difference (SMD) was used to evaluate and compare the treatment effects of orthodontic camouflage treatment and orthognathic surgery in adult C-III-M patients. Test for overall effect from the studies was used to estimate the treatment effect of C-III-M. However, Significant heterogeneity and publication bias was apparent among the selected studies. More research on the treatment effects of orthodontic camouflage treatment and orthognathic surgery in C-III-M is necessary to conclude possible interactions with better specificity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alam, M. K., Nowrin, S. A., Shahid, F., Alharby, H., Abutayyem, H., Alswairki, H. J., & El-Din Mohamed, S. K. (2022, April 1). Orthognathic versus Camouflage Treatment of Class III Malocclusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Applied Sciences (Switzerland). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073314

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free