A deep learning method to automatically identify reports of scientifically rigorous clinical research from the biomedical literature: Comparative analytic study

44Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: A major barrier to the practice of evidence-based medicine is efficiently finding scientifically sound studies on a given clinical topic. Objective: To investigate a deep learning approach to retrieve scientifically sound treatment studies from the biomedical literature. Methods: We trained a Convolutional Neural Network using a noisy dataset of 403,216 PubMed citations with title and abstract as features. The deep learning model was compared with state-of-the-art search filters, such as PubMed’s Clinical Query Broad treatment filter, McMaster’s textword search strategy (no Medical Subject Heading, MeSH, terms), and Clinical Query Balanced treatment filter. A previously annotated dataset (Clinical Hedges) was used as the gold standard. Results: The deep learning model obtained significantly lower recall than the Clinical Queries Broad treatment filter (96.9% vs 98.4%; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Del Fiol, G., Michelson, M., Iorio, A., Cotoi, C., & Brian Haynes, R. (2018, June 1). A deep learning method to automatically identify reports of scientifically rigorous clinical research from the biomedical literature: Comparative analytic study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. JMIR Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.2196/10281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free