Effect of various short-term storage methods on viability of cancellous bone fragments

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To determine effects of various storage methods on ex vivo viability of cancellous bone fragments. Sample Population - Cancellous bone fragments obtained from 4 New Zealand White rabbits. Procedure - Cancellous bone fragments were stored for 3 hours on ice in 1 of 5 preservation solutions or in 0.9% NaCl. Fragments were then reperfused (37 C) in oxygenated physiologic buffer solution for 1 hour. Cellular viability in fragments was assessed by ethidium monoazide labeling and fluorescence microscopy. Results - Viability in fresh cancellous bone ranged from 85 to 100% (mean ± SEM, 88 ± 7%). Storage of fragments significantly reduced viability. Viability in bone fragments stored at 22 C in blood-soaked sponges or 0.9% NaCl solution was 63.8 ± 3 and 65.2 ± 7%, respectively. Use of cold 0.9% NaCl solution reduced viability to 53.6 ± 3%. Viability was significantly better for fragments stored in cold phosphate-buffered sucrose (70.4 ± 2%) and EuroCollins (71.4 ± 3%) solutions. After warm reperfusion, viability was best for fragments stored in cold phosphate-buffered sucrose (70.2 ± 4%), EuroCollins (72.6 ± 3%), or UW lactobionate solutions (69.6 ± 3%), compared with those stored in cold 0.9% NaCl (47.6 ± 3%) or hypertonic citrate (53.0 ± 3%) solutions or blood-soaked sponges (57.2 ± 3%). Conclusions - Hypothermic storage in solutions designed to prevent temperature-dependent cell injury were best for maintaining cancellous bone fragment viability. Clinical Relevance - Hypothermia may be advantageous for use in storing cancellous bone fragments during procedures that dictate a prolonged period between harvest and placement of graft fragments. (Am J Vet Res 1999;60:63-67).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McAnulty, J. F. (1999). Effect of various short-term storage methods on viability of cancellous bone fragments. American Journal of Veterinary Research, 60(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.1999.60.01.63

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free