Estudio comparativo de recuperación de formas parasitarias por tres diferentes métodos de enriquecimiento coproparasitológico

20Citations
Citations of this article
177Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A total of 165 fecal samples were analyzed, using two sedimentation methods: Ritchie (R), Carles Barthelemy (CB), and one of flotation: Willis (W), in order to optimize intestinal parasites diagnosis and to determine the techniques effectiveness. Parasites were found in 119 (72.12%) of those analyzed. Significant differences were in protozoa recovery (p < 0,001), being observed 81.4% (R), 77.4% (CB), and 57.8% (W). Blastocystis hominis, Giardia lamblia, Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura were recovered more frequency by means of sedimentation, being Ritchie's method the most effective one (p < 0.05).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Navone, G. T., Gamboa, M. I., Kozubsky, L. E., Costas, M. E., Cardozo, M. S., Sisliauskas, M. N., & Gonźlez, M. (2005). Estudio comparativo de recuperación de formas parasitarias por tres diferentes métodos de enriquecimiento coproparasitológico. Parasitologia Latinoamericana, 60(3–4), 178–181. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-77122005000200014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free