Disentangling and Operationalizing AI Fairness at LinkedIn

14Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Operationalizing AI fairness at LinkedIn's scale is challenging not only because there are multiple mutually incompatible definitions of fairness but also because determining what is fair depends on the specifics and context of the product where AI is deployed. Moreover, AI practitioners need clarity on what fairness expectations need to be addressed at the AI level. In this paper, we present the evolving AI fairness framework used at LinkedIn to address these three challenges. The framework disentangles AI fairness by separating out equal treatment and equitable product expectations. Rather than imposing a trade-off between these two commonly opposing interpretations of fairness, the framework provides clear guidelines for operationalizing equal AI treatment complemented with a product equity strategy. This paper focuses on the equal AI treatment component of LinkedIn's AI fairness framework, shares the principles that support it, and illustrates their application through a case study. We hope this paper will encourage other big tech companies to join us in sharing their approach to operationalizing AI fairness at scale, so that together we can keep advancing this constantly evolving field.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quiñonero Candela, J., Wu, Y., Hsu, B., Jain, S., Ramos, J., Adams, J., … Basu, K. (2023). Disentangling and Operationalizing AI Fairness at LinkedIn. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (pp. 1213–1228). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free