Abstract
Background. For new antibiotics to treat Gram-negative infections, one regulatory pathway includes complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) clinical trials. Although individual clinical trials comply with regulatory guidelines, they may differ substantially in design and execution. Six recent cUTI trials that supported or are likely to support FDA regulatory review were compared to determine variables that impacted patient selection and outcome parameters. Methods. cUTI trials for six new antibiotics developed to treat multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative infections were obtained from publicly disclosed information including FDA documents, publications, or presentations at scientific meetings. Antibiotics included were: ceftolozane-tazobactam (CTL-TAZ), ceftazidime-avibactam (CTZ-AVI), meropenem-vaborbactam (MER-VAB), cefiderocol, plazomicin, and fosfomycin. Comparison variables included: mMITT sample size, age, % female patients, % acute pyelonephritis, % E. coli and other pathogens at baseline, switch to PO antibiotic, and the non-inferiority margin. Other variables as well as the microbiologic eradication, clinical response, and the combined outcomes will be included in the poster.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Bass, A., Echols, R., Portsmouth, S., & Howell, A. (2018). 1521. Heterogeneity of Recent Phase 3 cUTI Clinical Trials with New Antibiotics. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 5(suppl_1), S472–S472. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofy210.1350
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.