Valor predictivo de la historia clínica y el examen físico en el diagnóstico de la neumonía del adulto adquirida en la comunidad. Revisión de la literatura

9Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Distinguishing pneumonia from other causes of respiratory illnesses, such as bronchitis, influenza and upper respiratory tract infections, has important therapeutic and prognostic implications. This decision is usually made by clinical assessment alone or by performing a chest x-ray. The reference standard for diagnosing pneumonia is chest radiography, but many physicians rely on history and physical examination to diagnose or exclude this disease. A review of published studies of patients suspected of having pneumonia reveals that there are no individual clinical findings, or combination of findings, that can predict with certainty the diagnosis of pneumonia. Prediction rules have been recommended to guide the order of diagnostic tests, to maximize their clinical utility. Thus, some studies have shown that the absence of any vital sign abnormalities or any abnormalities on chest auscultation substantially reduces the likelihood of pneumonia to a point where further diagnostic evaluation may be unnecessary. This article reviews the literature on the appropriate use of the history and physical examination in diagnose community-acquired pneumonia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Saldías P, F., Méndez C, J. I., Ramírez R, D., & Díaz P, O. (2007, April). Valor predictivo de la historia clínica y el examen físico en el diagnóstico de la neumonía del adulto adquirida en la comunidad. Revisión de la literatura. Revista Medica de Chile. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872007000400016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free