Clinical diagnosis of enamel defects: Pitfalls and practical guidelines

125Citations
Citations of this article
126Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Changes in enamel during its development are permanently recorded, and commonly present as either demarcated opacity, diffuse opacity, or enamel hypoplasia. Developmental enamel defects may provide clues regarding their aetiology, and this may have application in clinical dentistry, dental epidemiology and anthropology. However, the usefulness of these applications may hampered by many pitfalls encountered in the detection and diagnosis of developmental enamel defects. The defects may be masked by saliva, dental plaque, and incorrect lighting. In addition, confounding effects of post-eruptive changes such as dental caries, attrition, and traumatic loss of tooth structure may impair the detection of developmental enamel defects. The non-specificity of appearance of enamel defects may make aetiologic diagnosis of enamel hypoplasia difficult. Furthermore, difficulty is often encountered in the relative timing of events in enamel hypoplasia, due to limited data on the chronology of development of the human dentition. In this review, pitfalls in the clinical assessment of enamel defects are discussed, and guidelines to overcome some of these difficulties are presented.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seow, W. K. (1997). Clinical diagnosis of enamel defects: Pitfalls and practical guidelines. International Dental Journal, 47(3), 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595X.1997.tb00783.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free