Enhancing and Not Replacing Clinical Expertise: Improving Named-Entity Recognition in Colonoscopy Reports Through Mixed Real–Synthetic Training Sources

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: In routine practice, colonoscopy findings are saved as unstructured free text, limiting secondary use. Accurate named-entity recognition (NER) is essential to unlock these descriptions for quality monitoring, personalized medicine and research. We compared named-entity recognition (NER) models trained on real, synthetic, and mixed data to determine whether privacy preserving synthetic reports can boost clinical information extraction. Methods: Three Spark NLP biLSTM CRF models were trained on (i) 100 manually annotated Romanian colonoscopy reports (ModelR), (ii) 100 prompt-generated synthetic reports (ModelS), and (iii) a 1:1 mix (ModelM). Performance was tested on 40 unseen reports (20 real, 20 synthetic) for seven entities. Micro-averaged precision, recall, and F1-score values were computed; McNemar tests with Bonferroni correction assessed pairwise differences. Results: ModelM outperformed single-source models (precision 0.95, recall 0.93, F1 0.94) and was significantly superior to ModelR (F1 0.70) and ModelS (F1 0.64; p < 0.001 for both). ModelR maintained high accuracy on real text (F1 = 0.90), but its accuracy fell when tested on synthetic data (0.47); the reverse was observed for ModelS (F1 = 0.99 synthetic, 0.33 real). McNemar χ2 statistics (64.6 for ModelM vs. ModelR; 147.0 for ModelM vs. ModelS) greatly exceeded the Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold (α = 0.0167), confirming that the observed performance gains were unlikely to be due to chance. Conclusions: Synthetic colonoscopy descriptions are a valuable complement, but not a substitute for real annotations, while AI is helping human experts, not replacing them. Training on a balanced mix of real and synthetic data can help to obtain robust, generalizable NER models able to structure free-text colonoscopy reports, supporting large-scale, privacy-preserving colorectal cancer surveillance and personalized follow-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ioanovici, A. C., Feier, A. M., Mărușteri, M. Ștefan, Trâmbițaș-Miron, A. D., & Dobru, D. E. (2025). Enhancing and Not Replacing Clinical Expertise: Improving Named-Entity Recognition in Colonoscopy Reports Through Mixed Real–Synthetic Training Sources. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm15080334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free