Abstract
Full-body motion capture typically requires sensors/markers to be placed on each rigid body segment, which results in long setup times and is obtrusive. The number of sensors/markers can be reduced using deep learning or offline methods. However, this requires large training datasets and/or sufficient computational resources. Therefore, we investigate the following research question: “What is the performance of a shallow approach, compared to a deep learning one, for estimating time coherent full-body poses using only five inertial sensors?”. We propose to incorporate past/future inertial sensor information into a stacked input vector, which is fed to a shallow neural network for estimating full-body poses. Shallow and deep learning approaches are compared using the same input vector configurations. Additionally, the inclusion of acceleration input is evaluated. The results show that a shallow learning approach can estimate full-body poses with a similar accuracy (∼6 cm) to that of a deep learning approach (∼7 cm). However, the jerk errors are smaller using the deep learning approach, which can be the effect of explicit recurrent modelling. Furthermore, it is shown that the delay using a shallow learning approach (72 ms) is smaller than that of a deep learning approach (117 ms).
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wouda, F. J., Giuberti, M., Rudigkeit, N., van Beijnum, B. J. F., Poel, M., & Veltink, P. H. (2019). Time coherent full-body poses estimated using only five inertial sensors: Deep versus shallow learning. Sensors (Switzerland), 19(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19173716
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.