The Science of Group and Organizational Processes

  • Mackenzie K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article is the first of a pair about the representation of group and organizational processes. The article begins with a model of the science of group and organizational processes. It depicts the main subcommunities and how their interdependence affects their progress. This interdependence would be improved if there was a common definition and representation for group and organizational processes. Recognizing that there are many existing concepts of group and organizational processes and several efforts to create a representation, it is clear that more work is required. A common representation of group and organizational processes ought to meet five criteria in order to be feasible. Then, to select among the feasible candidates, a set of ten desiderata for comparing, contrasting, and synthesizing them is presented. The second article in this series derives a working common representation of group and organizational processes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mackenzie, K. D. (2012). The Science of Group and Organizational Processes. Engineering Management Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/emr.v1n2p133

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free