Abstract
Equity, diversity, inclusion, and decolonizing (EDI/D) have gained discursive centrality in Canadian higher education (HE) yet are criticized as performative. Donald’s work on “ethical relationality” understands colonialism as a denial of relations. Drawing on this work I analyze EDI/D in HE through a lens of relationship building. The study maps three institutional layers of EDI/D. The external layer is centred on confronting overt critique, with discourses about EDI/D as threatening academic freedom becoming more prevalent. The second layer focuses on the “mainstream” adoption of EDI/D. EDI/D became central in terminology, but HE culture is more resistant to change. The inner layer includes those engaged with EDI/D. It is grounded in collaboration, but also in containment and fragmentation of EDI/D initiatives. These layers reveal institutional gaslighting tactics that derail meaningful engagement with EDI/D. For EDI/D to be transformative, HE institutions must ground EDI/D in the difficult process of relationship building.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Marom, L. (2023). Resistance, Performativity, and Fragmentation: The Relational Arena of EDI/D in Canadian Higher Education. Canadian Journal of Education, 46(4), 1083–1114. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.6071
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.