Resistance, Performativity, and Fragmentation: The Relational Arena of EDI/D in Canadian Higher Education

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Equity, diversity, inclusion, and decolonizing (EDI/D) have gained discursive centrality in Canadian higher education (HE) yet are criticized as performative. Donald’s work on “ethical relationality” understands colonialism as a denial of relations. Drawing on this work I analyze EDI/D in HE through a lens of relationship building. The study maps three institutional layers of EDI/D. The external layer is centred on confronting overt critique, with discourses about EDI/D as threatening academic freedom becoming more prevalent. The second layer focuses on the “mainstream” adoption of EDI/D. EDI/D became central in terminology, but HE culture is more resistant to change. The inner layer includes those engaged with EDI/D. It is grounded in collaboration, but also in containment and fragmentation of EDI/D initiatives. These layers reveal institutional gaslighting tactics that derail meaningful engagement with EDI/D. For EDI/D to be transformative, HE institutions must ground EDI/D in the difficult process of relationship building.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marom, L. (2023). Resistance, Performativity, and Fragmentation: The Relational Arena of EDI/D in Canadian Higher Education. Canadian Journal of Education, 46(4), 1083–1114. https://doi.org/10.53967/cje-rce.6071

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free