Job satisfaction and contingent employment

29Citations
Citations of this article
104Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper analyses job satisfaction as an aggregate of satisfaction with several job aspects, with special focus on the influence of contingent-employment contracts. Fixed-effect analysis is applied on a longitudinal sample of Dutch employees in four work arrangements: regular, fixed-term, on-call and temporary agency work. Our results indicate that temporary agency work is the only contingent employment relation that is on average associated with lower job satisfaction compared to regular workers. Decomposition of this gap indicates that the major part is due to the low satisfaction experienced by agency workers regarding the content of their jobs. A lack of job security is also responsible for part of the gap. For fixed-term and on-call workers the negative satisfaction effect originating from the lack of job security and lower wages is compensated by other job aspects and a variant relationship between total job satisfaction and its components. However, male and high educated on-call workers do experience lower job satisfaction. © 2011 The Author(s).

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Graaf-Zijl, M. (2012). Job satisfaction and contingent employment. Economist, 160(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10645-011-9180-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free