Predicting the Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Intensitymodulated Radiotherapy based on Radiomic Features

  • Wang H
  • Xu J
  • Bai Y
  • et al.
0Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to develop a method for predicting short-term outcomes of lung cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using radiomic features detected through computed tomography images. Methods: A prediction model was developed based on a dataset of radiomic features obtained from 132 patients with lung cancer receiving IMRT. Dimension reduction was performed for the features using the maximum-relevance and minimum-redundancy (mRMR) algorithm, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was utilized to optimize feature selection for the IMRT-sensitivity prediction model. The model was constructed using binary logistic regression analysis and was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic curve, and decision curve analysis. Results: Fifty features were selected from 1348 radiomic features using the mRMR method. Of these, three radiomic features were selected by LASSO logistic regression to construct the radiomics nomogram. The C-index of the model was 0.776 (95% confidence interval: 0.689–0.862) and 0.791 (95% confidence interval: 0.607–0.974) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed that the radiomics nomogram was clinically useful. Conclusion: Radiomic features have the potential to be applied to predict the short-term efficacy of IMRT in patients with inoperable lung cancer. © 2024 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, H., Xu, J., Bai, Y., Wang, Y., Shao, W., Yun, W., … Xu, J. (2023). Predicting the Prognosis of Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Intensitymodulated Radiotherapy based on Radiomic Features. Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews, 20. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573405620666230906092228

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free