To Intervene or Not to Intervene: Cost based Intervention for Combating Fake News

10Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Social media platforms provide valuable and powerful means with which users can share content, comment, and communicate. They also suffer from abuse through the dissemination of fake news and misinformation. While a fair amount of work has been done on detecting fake news, on the complementary problem of limiting its propagation, progress has been modest. Once an item is detected as fake, a social media company can intervene on the item and take an appropriate action, including hard intervention (e.g., removing an account) and soft intervention (e.g., labeling the item as "suspicious"). Given that fake news detectors are not 100% reliable, we study the problem of developing a cost aware intervention policy which decides whether to intervene based on the truthiness and popularity of the item. Our solution, Solomon, consists of three modular components - truthiness estimation, popularity estimation (with and without intervention), and intervention policy. Our extensive experiments on real and fake news from multiple domains show that Solomon can perform effective intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thirumuruganathan, S., Simpson, M., & Lakshmanan, L. V. S. (2021). To Intervene or Not to Intervene: Cost based Intervention for Combating Fake News. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 2300–2309). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448016.3452778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free