Practical Implications of Miller v. Jackson: Obtaining Relief in Court and before the Parole Board

  • Levick M
  • Schwartz R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The article discusses the Supreme Court cases of the U.S. regarding certain practical challenges pertaining to vacated mandatory life sentences for juveniles as portrayed in Miller v. Alabama. In Miller case, despite the Court ended mandatory life sentences for juveniles however it did not provide inform about how it matters. In Jackson v. Hobbs, the court upheld that life without parole on a child was cruel, hence, precedent of two cases depicts the violation of the U.S. Eighth Amendment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Levick, M. L., & Schwartz, R. G. (2013). Practical Implications of Miller v. Jackson: Obtaining Relief in Court and before the Parole Board. Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, 31(2), 369. https://doi.org/10.24926/25730037.490

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free