An Autoethnographic Dialogue with Motherhood Literature

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This autoethnography represents the first author’s journey as a mother and doctoral student researching mothers’ experiences in contending with the demands of work and family. Reading across different pockets of empirical motherhood literature (work-family conflict, contemporary motherhood, maternal gatekeeping, and intensive motherhood) I became troubled by how women’s realities were reflected. Pushing back against traditional methods that endorse separating my researcher identity from my maternal self, I draw on autoethnographic method to dialogue with this literature. This approach empowers me to speak out as a novice scholar uncomfortable with aspects of literature, while also navigating training in the use of traditional methods that often provide a directive to separate academic and personal identities. Importantly, doing so enables me to identify powerful insights about limitations in the literature, and how specific pockets of research can adversely affect the broader motherhood literature.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Autret, M., & van Eeden-Moorefield, B. (2024). An Autoethnographic Dialogue with Motherhood Literature. Qualitative Report, 29(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.6290

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free