Comparison of Numerical Methods for Geometric Warpage Compensation

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In injection molding processes, shrinkage and warpage cause deviations in the size and shape of produced parts compared to the cavity shape. While shrinkage is due to the change of material density during solidification, warpage is caused by uneven cooling and internal stresses within the part. One approach to mitigate these effects is by adjusting the cavity shape to anticipate the deformation. While finding the optimal cavity shape is often experience-based in practice, numerical design optimization can greatly assist in this process. In this study, we evaluate various numerical algorithms from existing literature to identify the optimal cavity shape. Each method is briefly outlined regarding how it adapts the geometry, and we discuss their respective strengths and weaknesses for different scenarios. We conduct comparisons using 3D geometries of varying complexity. Our findings demonstrate that, for geometric warpage compensation, the node-based reverse geometry method yields the least warpage and is computationally cost-effective. Furthermore, it is straightforward to implement and consistently performs well across different geometries.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tillmann, S., Basermann, S., & Elgeti, S. (2025). Comparison of Numerical Methods for Geometric Warpage Compensation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 97(9), 1280–1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.5404

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free