Abstract
Background: Globally, 36% of deaths among children can be attributed to environmental factors. However, no comprehensive list of environmental exposures exists. We seek to address this gap by developing a literaturemining algorithm to catalog prenatal environmental exposures. Methods: We designed a framework called PEPPER: Prenatal Exposure PubMed ParsER to a) catalog prenatal exposures studied in the literature and b) identify study type. Using PubMed Central, PEPPER classifies article type (methodology, systematic review) and catalogs prenatal exposures. We coupled PEPPER with the FDA's food additive database to form a master set of exposures. Results: We found that of 31 764 prenatal exposure studies only 53.0% were methodology studies. PEPPER consists of 219 prenatal exposures, including a common set of 43 exposures. PEPPER captured prenatal exposures from 56.4% of methodology studies (9492/16 832 studies). Two raters independently reviewed 50 randomly selected articles and annotated presence of exposures and study methodology type. Error rates for PEPPER's exposure assignment ranged from 0.56% to 1.30% depending on the rater. Evaluation of the study type assignment showed agreement ranging from 96% to 100% (kappa=0.909, p
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Boland, M. R., Kashyap, A., Xiong, J., Holmes, J., & Lorch, S. (2018). Development and validation of the PEPPER framework (Prenatal Exposure PubMed ParsER) with applications to food additives. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(11), 1432–1443. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy119
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.