Comparison of three microarray probe annotation pipelines: differences in strategies and their effect on downstream analysis

  • Neerincx P
  • Casel P
  • Prickett D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Reliable annotation linking oligonucleotide probes to target genes is essential for functional biological analysis of microarray experiments. We used the IMAD, OligoRAP and sigReannot pipelines to update the annotation for the ARK-Genomics Chicken 20 K array as part of a joined EADGENE/SABRE workshop. In this manuscript we compare their annotation strategies and results. Furthermore, we analyse the effect of differences in updated annotation on functional analysis for an experiment involving Eimeria infected chickens and finally we propose guidelines for optimal annotation strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neerincx, P. B., Casel, P., Prickett, D., Nie, H., Watson, M., Leunissen, J. A., … Klopp, C. (2009). Comparison of three microarray probe annotation pipelines: differences in strategies and their effect on downstream analysis. BMC Proceedings, 3(S4). https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-6561-3-s4-s1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free