Analgesic efficacy in head and neck cancer patients using tapentadol vs tramadol plus paracetamol

  • Narayanasamy R
  • Thiagarajan S
  • Perumal K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: We aimed to assess the pain control and tolerance to drug induced emesis in Head and Neck Squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with progressive disease post-concurrent Chemoradiation using single agent tapentadol vs. oral tramadol plus paracetamol. Methods: HNSCC patients with progressive disease post concurrent chemoradiation experiencing severe pain were randomised to three groups (20 patients in each group). Group-A received tapentadol 50mg twice daily; dose was increased up 200mg with 6 hours interval, if pain persisted. Group-B received tramadol plus paracetamol with antiemetics. Group-C received tramadol plus paracetamol without antiemetics. Patients were evaluated on 3 and 4 weeks of treatment for pain using Visual Analogue Scale. Results: In Group-A, 18 (90%) patients had good pain relief with pain score0-1 of which 31 patients showed pain relief with 50mg twice daily and 4 had dose escalation of 50mg four times daily, 1 patient showed skin allergy with good pain control, 4 patients were switched to morphine 10gm 4 hourly. In group-B, 17 (85%) patients had good pain relief with pain score 0-1, but 5 patients did not tolerate due to emesis and sedation, in spite of good pain relief; these 5 patients were switched to morphine 10mg 4 hourly. In group-C only 4 (20%) patients had pain relief; others did not tolerate emesis and sedation and were given symptomatic care. Conclusions: Single agent Tapentadol provided statistically superior pain control than combined tramadol with paracetamol, and was tolerated better by the patients without emesis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Narayanasamy, R. K., Thiagarajan, S., & Perumal, K. (2018). Analgesic efficacy in head and neck cancer patients using tapentadol vs tramadol plus paracetamol. Annals of Oncology, 29, ix95. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy438.005

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free