Refusing life-prolonging medical treatment and the ECHR

5Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article considers the content of the right to refuse life-prolonging medical treatment under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), as well as the supervision by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) of domestic legal regimes for refusing life-prolonging treatment. I argue, employing doctrinal and philosophical analyses, that developments in the Convention jurisprudence with regard to the protection of private life under article 8 ECHR imply a substantively extensive right to refuse life-prolonging treatment, both contemporaneously and in advance. Moreover, I suggest that there is sufficient consensus among Council of Europe Member States on the right to refuse lifeprolonging treatment to engage ECtHR supervision of states' legal frameworks for such refusals. In addition, or in the alternative, I advance that the Strasbourg court may scrutinise Member States' legal arrangements for refusals of life-prolonging treatment in virtue of the positive obligations to secure respect for private life that inhere in article 8 ECHR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Black, I. (2018). Refusing life-prolonging medical treatment and the ECHR. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38(2), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free