Abstract
This commentary, in response to Dixon et al. (Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8, 7–15, 2015), describes difficulties in defining metrics of quality in graduate training for different audiences (types of applicants). Outcome measures are preferred whenever possible, supplemented by subjective but frequently used opinion surveys.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Iwata, B. A. (2015). Metrics of Quality in Graduate Training. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 8(2), 136–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-015-0076-x
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free