Explanatoriness is evidentially irrelevant, or inference to the best explanation meets Bayesian confirmation theory

59Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

In the world of philosophy of science, the dominant theory of confirmation is Bayesian. In the wider philosophical world, the idea of inference to the best explanation exerts a considerable influence. Here we place the two worlds in collision, using Bayesian confirmation theory to argue that explanatoriness is evidentially irrelevant. © 2013 The Authors 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Analysis Trust. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roche, W., & Sober, E. (2013). Explanatoriness is evidentially irrelevant, or inference to the best explanation meets Bayesian confirmation theory. Analysis, 73(4), 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/ant079

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free