Fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase from Synechococcus leopoliensis

  • GERBLING K
  • STEUP M
  • LATZKO E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Extracts of Synechococcus leopoliensis(Anacystis nidulans) contain two forms of D‐fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase(EC 3.1.3.11) previously designatedas forms A and B [Gerbling, K.‐P., Steup, M., and Latsko, E. (1984) Arch. Microbiol . 137, 109–114]. Form B, which probably represents the mahor part of the total extractable fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase activity, has been purified to apparent homogeneity. Gel filtration, non‐denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and cross‐linking with bis(sulfosuccinimidyl) suberate revealed that the fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase B exists in either a dimeric or in a tetrameric subform, depending upon the absence or presence of fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphate and Mg 2+ . The dimer–tetramer interconversion was readily reversible. The results provide evidence for a two‐step activation of fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase B involving the reduction of the dimeric subform and the subsequent substrate‐dependent conversion of the reduced dimer to a reduced tetramer, which is the only catalytically active state. In contrast to form B, no substrate‐dependent interconversion was detected with form A from S. leopoliensis .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

GERBLING, K., STEUP, M., & LATZKO, E. (1985). Fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase from Synechococcus leopoliensis. European Journal of Biochemistry, 147(1), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1985.tb08738.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free