Recalibrating Interpretations of Aldosterone Assays Across the Physiologic Range: Immunoassay and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Measurements Under Multiple Controlled Conditions

Abstract

Context: Clinicians frequently rely on aldosterone thresholds derived from older immunoassays to diagnose primary aldosteronism. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is increasingly widespread and reported to yield lower aldosterone concentrations. Objective: Given the health impact of incorrect interpretations of aldosterone levels, we compared measurements using LC-MS/MS and immunoassay across the full range of aldosterone physiology by evaluating distinct regulation by angiotensin II and adrenocorticotropin (ACTH). Methods: Normotensive volunteers underwent prospective characterization of aldosterone production by immunoassay and LC-MS/MS during 4 conditions (n = 188): oral sodium suppression and restriction (to assess angiotensin II-mediated aldosterone production) and dexamethasone suppression and cosyntropin stimulation (to assess ACTH-mediated aldosterone production). Results: Serum aldosterone concentrations by LC-MS/MS and immunoassay had a correlation of 0.69 (P < .001), with an average difference of 37.2%. The most notable discrepancy was in the clinically discriminatory range <20 ng/dL: 9.9 (7.1, 13.8) ng/dL using immunoassay corresponded to 5.5 (1.4, 8.9) ng/dL by LC-MS/MS (P