Response of melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to weathered SPLAT-Spinosad-Cue-Lure

22Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Studies were conducted in Hawaii to measure attraction of male melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) (Diptera: Tephritidae), to SPLAT-Cue-Lure (C-L) and SPLAT-Melo-Lure (M-L) (raspberry ketone formate). Direct field comparisons of SPLAT-C-L and SPLAT-M-L at low (5%) and high (20%) concentrations indicated few differences in attraction over a 15-wk period. Subsequently, only SPLAT-Spinosad-C-L (5%) was compared with Min-U-Gel C-L with naled (standard used in California) in weathering studies. Treatments were weathered for 1, 2, 4, and 8 wk in Riverside, CA, and shipped to Hawaii for attraction/toxicity tests under field and semifield conditions by using released males of controlled ages, and for feeding tests in the laboratory. In terms of attraction, SPLAT-Spinosad-C-L compared favorably to, or outperformed the current standard of Min-U-Gel-C-L with naled. In terms of toxicity, the cumulative 24-h mortality did not differ between the two insecticide-containing C-L treatments in field cage studies after 8 wk. However, in feeding studies in which individual males were exposed for 5 min to the different C-L treatments after 4 wk of weathering, SPLAT-Spinosad-C-L demonstrated reduced mortality compared with the Min-U-GelC-L with naled, suggesting reduced persistence of the spinosad material. Spinosad has low contact toxicity and when mixed with SPLAT and C-L offers a reduced risk alternative for control of B. cucurbitae and related C-Lresponding species, without many of the negative effects to humans and nontargets of broad-spectrum contact poisons such as naled. © 2010 Entomological Society of America.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vargas, R. I., Piñero, J. C., Jang, E. B., Mau, R. F. L., Stark, J. D., Gomez, L., … Mafra-Neto, A. (2010). Response of melon fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) to weathered SPLAT-Spinosad-Cue-Lure. Journal of Economic Entomology, 103(5), 1594–1602. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC09406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free