Boys and Their Toys: Status Inconsistency in Non-democratic Regimes and the Import of Major Weapon Systems

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Major weapon system imports are significant as they are useful for domestic and international security. However, states regularly imported weapons they want in addition to weapons they need. One explanation is that states import unnecessary weapons to gain status. We argue that states suffering from higher levels of negative status inconsistency (SI) import a greater proportion of status symbol weapons. To account for differing security motives, we also separate non-democratic regime types – strongman, junta, boss, and machine – as they vary in their international conflict propensity and domestic stability. Due to the differences across these regimes, we further argue that non-democratic personalist regimes will import more status symbol weapons. Using data covering 1965–1999, we find that negatively status inconsistent regimes import more status symbol weapons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, R. A. I., & Shreve, A. P. (2024). Boys and Their Toys: Status Inconsistency in Non-democratic Regimes and the Import of Major Weapon Systems. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 68(10), 2101–2127. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220027231220021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free