Bridging Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Resectable Breast Cancer: Is it Safe?

3Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has required new treatment paradigms to limit exposures and optimize hospital resources, including the use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAET) as bridging therapy for HR+/HER2-invasive tumors and DCIS. While this approach has been used in locally advanced disease, it is unclear how it may affect outcomes in resectable HR+/HER2- tumors. Methods: Women ≥18 years diagnosed with in situ (Tis) or non-metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer from March-May 2019 and 2020 were included. Fisher’s exact test and two-sample t test were used to compare baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes between strata. Sub-analysis was performed between patients who received primary surgery vs a bridging NAET approach. Results: Despite similar clinical characteristics, patients in 2019 were more likely to have a surgery-first approach (75% vs 42%, P-value =.0007), receive surgery sooner (22 vs 29 days, P-value

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iles, K. A., Thornton, M., Park, J., Roberson, M., Spanheimer, P. M., Ollila, D. W., & Gallagher, K. (2022). Bridging Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Resectable Breast Cancer: Is it Safe? American Surgeon, 88(3), 471–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348211047205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free