Randomised double-blind comparison of morphine vs. a morphine-alfentanil combination for patient-controlled analgesia

19Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a randomised, double-blind study, we compared a combination of morphine and alfentanil with morphine alone for patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) after Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. After surgery, patients were randomly allocated to receive PCA with a bolus dose of either morphine 0.75 mg plus alfentanil 0.125 mg (Group MA, n = 40) or morphine 1.5 mg alone (Group M, n = 37) with a lockout interval of 8 min and no hourly dose limit. Clinical assessments were made in the first 24 h, after which patients completed a written questionnaire. There were no differences between groups in PCA usage or visual analogue scale pain scores measured at 2, 4, 6 and 24 h. There was a low incidence of side-effects in both groups. In the questionnaire, patients in Group MA scored higher compared with Group M when asked to grade speed of onset and effectiveness of analgesia after a PCA bolus; there were no differences in grading for duration of analgesia or overall patient satisfaction. Addition of alfentanil to morphine may have advantages for PCA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ngan Kee, W. D., Khaw, K. S., & Wong, E. L. Y. (1999). Randomised double-blind comparison of morphine vs. a morphine-alfentanil combination for patient-controlled analgesia. Anaesthesia, 54(7), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00844.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free