Efficacy of supplementary image schemes on reading motivation and comprehension

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examines the efficacy of three teaching methods, namely, passive supported image pedagogy, active supported image pedagogy, and traditional instruction, in increasing the reading motivation and comprehension of students. 116 fourth-grade students participated in the study and were evenly assigned, according to their pre-test performance, to one of three groups: "Passive Supported Group" (PSG), "Active Supported Group" (ASG), and "Text-only Group" (TOG). The PSG was asked to read a text with images; the ASG was asked to read the text and reconstruct the main ideas through image selection; and the TOG was asked merely to read the text. After eight weeks of reading-training, the three groups were asked to complete post-tests. Following this, independent-samples t-test and paired-samples t-test were used to analyze the results. Based on the results, active supported image pedagogy was found to be the most effective method for improving the reading motivation and comprehension of students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chang, Y. M., Wang, I. C., & Ma, M. Y. (2016). Efficacy of supplementary image schemes on reading motivation and comprehension. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(5), 1153–1162. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1503a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free