Equity and Bond Market Signals as Leading Indicators of Bank Fragility

  • Gropp R
  • Vesala J
  • Vulpes G
162Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyse the ability of the distance to default and subordinated bond spreads to signal bank fragility in a sample of EU banks. We find leading properties for both indicators. The distance to default exhibits lead times of 6–18 months. Spreads have signal value close to problems only. We also find that implicit safety nets weaken the predictive power of spreads. Further, the results suggest complementarity between both indicators. We also examine the interaction of the indicators with other information and find that their additional information content may be small but not insignificant. The results suggest that market indicators reduce type II errors relative to predictions based on accounting information only.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gropp, R., Vesala, J., & Vulpes, G. (2006). Equity and Bond Market Signals as Leading Indicators of Bank Fragility. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(2), 399–428. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free