Ranking the Regimes in Aristotle's Politics: The Four-Principles Approach

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is a long-standing debate over which constitution Aristotle regards as best in the Politics. I attempt to clarify his view by reconstructing four principles he uses to assess constitutions, in both ideal and more ordinary circumstances: (i) the supremacy-of-virtue principle, (ii) the more-virtuous-citizens-are-better-than-fewer principle, (iii) the equality principle, and (iv) the stability principle. I apply these principles to defend a rank ordering of constitutions, which situates the ideal aristocracy of books 7 and 8 at the top, and tyranny, along with unmixed forms of democracy and oligarchy, at the bottom.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mittiga, R. (2021). Ranking the Regimes in Aristotle’s Politics: The Four-Principles Approach. Review of Politics, 83(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003467052000087X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free