Responses of seeds of typical Brassica crops to tetracycline stress: Sensitivity difference and source analysis

21Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Antibiotics can induce adverse effects on plants. Brassica crop seeds, for their advantages, are used widely in seed germination test to investigate phytotoxicity of substances. However, their performances on evaluating antibiotics remain to be studied to select sensitive species for control of potential risks. In this work, common species of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.), edible rape (Brassica napus L.), and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.) with three cultivars each were selected to compare and analyze the sensitivity difference of their seeds to tetracycline (TC) stress. Results showed that the ratio of axis to cotyledon (RAC) by fresh weight was an alternative endpoint besides radicle length (RL) in the test. The species sensitivity distribution (SSD) based on the effective concentrations causing x% inhibition (ECx) in RL of seeds exposed to TC was applied to compare the sensitivity of seeds and estimate the hazardous concentration for x% species (HCx). From the species-dependent sensitivity and the sensitivity difference of cultivars in the same species of seeds to TC, the performance of Chinese cabbage was the best in the study. The sensitivity of seeds to TC could be evaluated by EC20 related to seed physical traits and germination indices, while the extent of seeds affected by TC could be evaluated by EC50 related to the composition of seed storage reserves. We recommended that it was a new idea to analyze responses of different seeds to TC at large scale according to seed innate characteristics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luo, Y., Liang, J., Zeng, G., Li, X., Chen, M., Jiang, L., … Tang, N. (2019). Responses of seeds of typical Brassica crops to tetracycline stress: Sensitivity difference and source analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109597

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free