Invasive cervical cancer: A failure of screening

34Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Cervical screening is an effective prevention measure. It is unclear whether cervical cancer results from non-participation in screening or from failures in detection by screening. Analysis of the screening history of patients with cervix cancer may contribute to understanding failures in prevention. Methods: A cohort of patients presenting during 1 year was identified. Dates and results of cervical smears in the 4 years prior to presentation were extracted from a screening database. Patients were grouped as follows: 'No screening' - no Pap records; 'Pre-diagnostic' - one or more Pap tests within 6 months of presentation; 'Sporadic screening' - one Pap test between 6 and 48 months prior to presentation; and 'Regular screening' - at least two Pap tests 6-48 months before presentation. Results: 225 patients were identified (median age: 48 years, range 25-107). Eighty- eight had no records of screening; a further 66 were categorized as pre-diagnostic. These two groups (68% of incident cases) were considered not to have participated in routine screening. A further 15% had sporadic screening tests, but only 37 patients (16%) had evidence of regular screening. Clinically, 53, 41 and 6% presented with early, locally advanced and metastatic disease, respectively. Older patients (>50 years) were more likely to present with advanced disease (61 vs 37% at least Stage II). Conclusions: These results suggest that the failure to prevent invasive cervix cancer in this population can largely be attributed to failures in recruitment for screening. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spayne, J., Ackerman, I., Milosevic, M., Seidenfeld, A., Covens, A., & Paszat, L. (2008). Invasive cervical cancer: A failure of screening. European Journal of Public Health, 18(2), 162–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckm043

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free