Is routine screening for silent pulmonary embolism justified in patients with deep vein thrombosis?

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The incidence of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) exceeds 70% in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), even in cases of distal deep vein thrombosis. We report the case of a patient with a diagnosis of DVT in the lower left limb associated with asymptomatic PE who presented late symptoms due to this same PE. The absence of acute symptoms and the late onset of symptoms could have provoked doubts about the most appropriate treatment, resulting in unnecessary interventions, if pulmonary embolism had not already been diagnosed with tomography. In the present case, we demonstrate that computed tomography angiography conducted at the time of DVT diagnosis accurately diagnosed PE and prevented any misinterpretation of recurrent DVT in a patient already being medicated, which could have been mistakenly interpreted as demonstrating failure of anticoagulant therapy. Such a situation could lead to unnecessary intervention to fit an inferior vena cava filter. We cannot suggest that a classic medical conduct should be reformulated simply on the basis of a case report. However, we would be remiss not to suggest that well-designed studies should be carried out in the future to assess the need for this examination in the acute phase.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, M. J., Mendes, C. de A., Kuzniec, S., Krutman, M., & Wolosker, N. (2021). Is routine screening for silent pulmonary embolism justified in patients with deep vein thrombosis? Jornal Vascular Brasileiro, 20. https://doi.org/10.1590/1677-5449.200124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free